Wednesday, December 10, 2008

What do you mean Calvin Klein isn't a real man?

Tyler Durden has a very different opinion of necessary things than the rest of us. Tyler thinks that a leaking roof, sketchy electricity, and a makeshift chemistry lab are luxuries. Tyler seems to be at one extreme end of the food, water, shelter thought process, whereas Edward Norton leans toward the food, water, Armani way of thinking. Edward Norton talks extensively about his Ikea furniture throughout the movie. Near the beginning, Edward Norton is sitting on the toilet, looking at what appears to be a centerfold. The magazine is actually an Ikea catalog that contains no pictures of nude women. Edward also tells Tyler that he had almost an entire lifetime’s set of outfits, and that he was “this close” to never needing another outfit for the rest of his life. Naturally Tyler, the modern Emerson, sees all these things as a hindrance to Edward’s true manhood. Tyler Durden solves this by blowing up Edward Norton’s apartment. This forces Edward Norton to move in with Tyler at Tyler’s derelict residence on Paper Street. What is rather odd about all this is the fact that Edward Norton and Tyler Durden are the same character. It’s bad enough when normal guys give each other a hard time about “being a man,” but this takes it to a new level. Tyler, or rather the book/movie is trying to make a statement about the modern American man. What’s interesting is that everyone, men and women alike watch Fight Club and marvel at how crazy the participants in the Fight Club are. Does this prove that Tyler has been right all along? Are we all sitting on our fake-leather couches watching this movie on a blu-ray player that we don’t need?! In a house that we can’t afford?!! Well whatever lol. Like I said in a high school lecture about transcendentalism; “I don’t see what the big deal is, I really like all my stuff…”

2 comments:

James said...

I'm not sure if Tyler Durden's point in reshaping the main character's life was trying to throw in his own ideals on what actually makes a man. I always thought that his whole reason of existing was to show that we are not people that should be defined. Tyler is saying that what makes us the people that we are aren't our clothes, expensive hair products, nice cars and fancy apartments. We are what are actions show (if that is the message Tyler is trying to show us, I could be reading him wrong.) Granted, the process he uses to us this message is extreme, but I suppose that that is the movies' "quirkiness" it's so famous for.

Ethan said...

I think that this is an accurate representation to the reason for Tyler Durden’s reason for existing. I also think he was there for another reason, because Edward was too afraid to show the other side of himself and act how he wanted to. This forced his mind to create Tyler so without knowing it he could release some of the pressure built up inside of him. Tyler’s role was one that many people sometimes imagine doing but would never dare to do. His psychopathic attitude reveals that Edward isn’t as cool and calm as he appears to the rest of the world.